MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012900837 · doi:10.1016/s0895-7061(03)00088-8

High blood pressure and associated risks in an Indian industrial population

2003· article· en· W2012900837 on OpenAlexaff
Vivek K. Chaturvedi

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hypertension · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressurePopulationHypertriglyceridemiaWaistDiabetes mellitusRisk factorObesityInternal medicineCross-sectional studyEnvironmental healthCholesterolEndocrinologyTriglyceridePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High blood pressure, and other cardiovascular disese (CVD) risk factors are increasingly prevalent in the urban Indian population. Data regarding this clustering of risk factors is scarce from developing countries. We carried out a comprehensive cross-sectional CVD risk factor prevalence study on 2200 male employees aged 21–59 years of an urban industrial population in India employing questionnaire, clinical examination and biochemical estimations. Most of the employees were below 45 years of age and the mean age was 42 years. The prevalence of hypertension (as per JNC VI criteria) and high-normal blood pressure was 30% and 17% respectively. Only 25% of the population had optimal blood pressure. Only a third of the hypertensives were aware of their status, while just 8% had their blood pressure controlled. Even in the age group 21–29 years, the prevalence of hypertension was 18%. The prevalence of other CVD risk factors in the hypertensive population was as follows: diabetes 20%, impaired fasting glucose 23%, total cholesterol>200mg/dl 35%, total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio≥4.5 67%, hypertriglyceridemia 48%, and central obesity (waist hip ratio≥ 0.95) 80% . The mean BMI for this population was 24 kg/m 2 and the mean waist circumference was high at 97 cm. . 41% of the study population was actively smoking at the time of the study. While the overall population had high prevalence of these risk factors, adverse trends in risk factors were significantly higher in the hypertensives as compared to non-hypertensives. As per the NCEP guidelines, about 25% of the overall population had metabolic syndrome. The prevalence rose further if the proposed lower cut-offs for obesity in Asian population were employed. While only 15% of the study population was free of any of traditional four risk factors, 45% had at least two risk factors. The prevalence of coronary heart disease, using modified Rose angina questionnaire and/or Minnesota-coded ECG abnormalities, in this population was 7.3%. This study demonstrates the high prevalence of adverse blood pressure profile in this comparatively young population and a low awareness of the same. The significant clustering of risk factors in this population is likely to increase greatly the absolute cardiovascular risk and underscores the urgent preventive measures which need to be implemented in developing countries like India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of HypertensionSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207