Effects of High-Temperature Stress on Soybean Isoflavone Concentration and Expression of Key Genes Involved in Isoflavone Synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isoflavones have been reported to have putative health-beneficial properties, which has led to increased interest and demand for soybeans and soy-based products. This study was conducted to determine the effects of high-temperature stress on isoflavone concentration and expression of four key genes involved in isoflavone synthesis (i.e., CHS7, CHS8, IFS1, and IFS2) in both soybean pods and seeds during their late reproductive stage (i.e., R5-R8). Isoflavone concentrations were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and gene expression was studied using quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR. High-temperature stress [33/25 °C (day/night temperatures)] imposed at the late reproductive stage (R5-R8) reduced total isoflavone concentration by 46-86 and 20-73% in seeds and pods, respectively, the reduction depending on the stage of maturity. At stage R5, the reduction in total isoflavone concentration was greater in seeds than in pods, whereas at subsequent stages, the reverse was observed. High-temperature stress had a large impact on the expression of CHS7, CHS8, IFS1, and IFS2 in both seeds and pods. In seeds, temperature stress reduced the expression of one gene at the R5 stage (CHS8), two genes at the R6 stage (CHS7 and IFS1), and all four genes at the R7 stage, the reduction ranging between 35 and 97%. In pods, high-temperature stress affected the expression of two genes at the R6 stage (CHS7 and IFS2) and all four genes at the R7 stage. Unlike in seeds, at the R6 stage, high temperature increased the expression of CHS7 and IFS2 by 72 and 736%, respectively, whereas at R7 stage the expression of all genes was reduced by an average of 97%. The present study reveals that high-temperature stress initiated at the R5 stage and maintained until maturation (i.e., R8 stage) has a rapid and sustained negative effect on isoflavone concentration in both seeds and pods. High temperature also affects gene expression; however, there was no clear correlation between isoflavone concentration and gene expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".