Effect of Chronic AT1 Receptor Antagonism on Postischemic Functional Recovery and AT1/AT2 Receptor Proteins in Isolated Working Rat Hearts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To determine whether chronic angiotensin II (Ang II) type I receptor (AT(1)R) antagonism improves recovery of left ventricular (LV) function after ischemia-reperfusion (IR) and increases AT(1)R and Ang II type 2 receptor (AT(2)R) protein expression in isolated working rat hearts, rats were randomized to pretreatment with either losartan (30 mg/kg/day) or UP269-6 (3 mg/kg/day), or no drug (control), for 1 week or 3 weeks before IR (50 min perfusion, 25 min ischemia, 40 min reperfusion). In vitro LV work and power and ex vivo AT(1)R and AT(2)R proteins (immunoblots) were measured. Compared to baseline perfusion, LV work and power showed variable recovery in control, losartan, and UP269-6 groups. Compared to control, losartan preserved recovery of LV work and power while UP269-6 showed less recovery after IR at both 1 week and 3 weeks. Both antagonists increased AT(2)R but not AT(1)R protein. The duration of pretreatment did not affect the expression of AT(1)R or AT(2)R proteins. The results indicate that chronic AT(1)R blockade over 1 or 3 weeks increases AT(2)R (not AT(1)R) protein expression and may preserve but not improve postischemic functional recovery compared to controls in isolated working rat hearts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".