Revision of Ooctonus in the Neotropical region and comparison with Boudiennyia (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ooctonus Haliday (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) contains four species in the Neotropical Region: O. clebschi Huber, sp. n., O. costaricensis Huber, sp. n., O. woolleyi Huber, sp. n., and O. zolnerowichi Huber, sp. n. Ooctonus costaricensis represents the furthest south Ooctonus has been recorded in the New World. An illustrated identification key to females is given. The genus is compared with Boudiennyia Girault, known only from Australia and New Caledonia. Despite many similarities, Ooctonus is treated as a somewhat isolated clade whereas Boudiennyia, apparently the most similar genus to Ooctonus, is treated as the basal clade of Mymarini sensu Annecke and Doutt. Reduction in tarsal number has occurred at least four times in three distantly related clades of extant Mymaridae: in Eoforesteria Mathot and Ptilomymar Annecke & Doutt, the latter newly placed in the Camptoptera-group of genera, in Kikiki Huber & Beardsley in the Anagrus group of genera, and in Mymarini except for Boudiennyia, and perhaps also Ooctonus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".