MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013016293 · doi:10.3109/08977191003662651

Levels of antiangiogenic factors in preeclamptic pregnancies

2010· article· en· W2013016293 on OpenAlexaff
Wenqiu Zhao, Jie Qiao, Qiufang Zhang, Yangyu Zhao, Qi Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueGrowth Factors · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsPQ Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreeclampsiaEndoglinPlacental growth factorMedicineEndothelial dysfunctionObstetricsPregnancyInternal medicineEndocrinologyVascular endothelial growth factorVEGF receptorsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preeclampsia is characterized by systemic maternal endothelial dysfunction that precedes the onset of clinical symptoms. Antiangiogenic factors are associated with preeclampsia. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the levels of three antiangiogenic factors in preeclamptic pregnancies with/without fetal growth restriction (FGR), and to compare their level in early onset or late onset preeclampsia. Antiangiogenic factors, soluble endoglin (sEndoglin), sFlt-1, and placental growth factor (PIGF) were analyzed in healthy and preeclamptic women (including seven with FGR) at three different time points. sEndoglin or sFlt-1 but not PIGF levels were significantly higher in women with preeclampsia at admission. The level of sEndoglin was significantly higher in early onset, and higher in preeclamptic pregnancies with FGR compared to those without FGR. The level of sEndoglin was correlated with mean arterial pressure or 24-h urine protein in preeclampsia. Our data potentially suggest that Endoglin level correlates with the clinical symptoms of preeclampsia and preeclamptic pregnancies with FGR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGrowth FactorsSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207