MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Toward low carbon energy systems: The convergence of wind power, demand response, and the electricity grid

2012· article· en· W2013061330 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Parkinson, Dan Wang, Ned Djilali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind powerDispatchable generationDemand responseRenewable energyEnvironmental economicsDistributed generationElectric power systemIntermittent energy sourceElectricity generationElectricityStand-alone power systemElectricity retailingPumped-storage hydroelectricityFossil fuelSmart gridComputer scienceElectricity marketEngineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineeringEconomicsWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large scale deployment of renewable generation is widely seen as the most promising option for displacing fossil fuel power generation, and for expanding generation capacity to meet the growing demand for electricity without increasing carbon emissions. A key challenge in integrating wind and other renewable power in the electricity grid is to devise approaches that ensure sustainability not only from the view point of carbon emissions, but also in terms of the market and operational constraints of the power system. This paper outlines some of the opportunities and challenges faced by power system operators in offsetting the negative impacts of wind power integration. The potential of traditionally passive loads in playing the role of resources that can be actively involved in offsetting wind variability will be discussed. We will then specifically consider a conceptual framework for incentive-based demand response in which highly-distributed low carbon energy conversion technologies, such as heat pumps, electric vehicles, and electrolyzers, act as dispatchable short-term energy balancing resources that support increasing levels of wind power integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207