Beneficial and deleterious effects of rosiglitazone on hypertension development in spontaneously hypertensive rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The antihypertensive effect of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma agonist rosiglitazone has been reported in patients with diabetes or obesity. The correlation of PPARgamma expression with blood pressure and the therapeutic application of rosiglitazone in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were investigated in the present study. Systolic blood pressure of 21-week SHR was significantly higher than that of age-matched Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) (225 +/- 5 v 144 +/- 2 mm Hg, P <.05). Basal expression levels of PPARgamma proteins in vascular tissues of 21-week SHR were significantly lower than that of age-matched 21-week WKY (P <.05). This reduced expression of PPARgamma was not detected between 5- and 13- week SHR and age-matched WKY. Cardiac PPARgamma expression was also not different among different age groups between SHR and WKY. Chronic treatment with rosiglitazone, but not PPARalpha agonist Wy14643, significantly retarded hypertension development and reversed abnormally faster heart rate in young SHR. An unfavorable effect of rosiglitazone treatment was the increased heart-to-body weight ratio accompanied by left ventricular hypertrophy. In conclusion, vascular PPARgamma protein expression in adult SHR (21 weeks) is significantly decreased in comparison with the age-matched WKY. Chronic rosiglitazone treatment retards hypertension development, but the associated prohypertrophy effect calls for a cautious use of this thiazolidinedindione in the treatment of insulin resistance syndrome associated with hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".