MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013174001 · doi:10.1177/1077546314545098

Nonlinear vibrational behavior of multi-body dynamical systems with bi-directional piecewise linear spring constraints

2014· article· en· W2013174001 on OpenAlexaff
Ya Li, Shu Dong Yu, De Lun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiecewise linear functionDiscretizationNonlinear systemPiecewiseMathematicsRestoring forceSpring (device)Equations of motionMathematical analysisDisplacement (psychology)Dynamical systems theoryHarmonic oscillatorControl theory (sociology)Classical mechanicsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nonlinear vibrational behavior of multi-body dynamical systems with piecewise linear spring characteristics under harmonic excitations is investigated in this paper using the Bozzak-Newmark-LCP numerical scheme. Each body is subjected to bi-directional piecewise linear spring constraints, which are activated when the initial gaps between the body and the secondary springs are consumed. The system equations of motion are discretized in the time domain using the Bozzak relaxation scheme. At each time step, a set of governing equations in terms of displacements are obtained using the Newmark integration scheme. Two auxiliary displacement vectors, complementary to the contact force vectors, are introduced to detect the engagement of gap activated springs with a resolution of the time step size. With the aid of a simple transformation, the nonlinear vibration problem of a multiple degrees-of-freedom (d.f.) piecewise-linear dynamical system is reduced to a mathematical programming problem for which an accurate and efficient solution satisfying the piecewise linear constraints everywhere can be obtained. The numerical scheme used in this paper was first validated for a single d.f. system with two-sided gap-activated springs under base excitation using the results available in the literature. Numerical results are obtained and presented for the dynamical behavior of a two-body oscillator with two primary springs and four gap-activated secondary springs under harmonic excitations over a wide range of values of system and excitation parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vibration and ControlSame topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207