Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary : The incidence and causes of awareness under general anesthesia are reviewed, as well as principles of prevention and management. Although intra-operative awareness is rare, occurring in 0.2-0.4% of all operations done under general anesthesia, it causes severe peri-operative and post-operative complications. Moreover, the incidence of awareness is higher in certain patients (e.g. those who are drug-tolerant), and certain procedures (e.g. cardiac surgery). Preventing awareness has been difficult because depth of hypnosis is difficult to measure. However, the bispectral index (BIS) system offers a new way to objectively measure depth of hypnosis. In most cases, BIS is not necessary, but in patients and procedures where the risk of awareness is high, BIS is a useful clinical tool. Methods : A Medline search was performed, crossing the medical subject headings "Awareness" and "General Anesthesia", and limiting the results to reviews or meta-analyses in English. This search yielded five relevant papers. The reference sections of these papers were searched to obtain other relevant papers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it