Historic Dietary Exposure to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate, Perfluorinated Carboxylates, and Fluorotelomer Unsaturated Carboxylates from the Consumption of Store-Bought and Restaurant Foods for the Canadian Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) have been detected in humans worldwide and are of health concern. This study measured the concentration of PFCs in composite samples collected for the 1998 Health Canada Total Diet Study and estimated dietary exposure for the Canadian population (older than 12 years of age) using previously collected dietary data (n = 1721). PFCs were detected in 8 samples including processed meats, preprepared foods, and peppers with a range of concentrations from 0.48 to 5.01 ng g(-1) (wet weight). 6:2 fluorotelomer unsaturated carboxylate (FTUCA) was detected in cold cuts at a concentration of 1.26 ng g(-1). Mean daily PFC exposure estimates ranged from 1.5 to 2.5 ng (kg of body weight)(-1). Perfluorinated carboxylates (PFCA C(7)-C(11)) contributed more to PFC exposure than either perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) or FTUCA. Total PFCAs in cakes and cookies, lunchmeats, and green vegetables were the main contributors to dietary exposure, although these exposure levels were below the provisional tolerable daily intake provided by the German Drinking Water Commission. Dietary exposure to total PFCs has not changed over time, although the contribution of PFOS to total PFC exposure may have increased between 1998 and 2004. Further research on the sources of contamination of processed and preprepared foods is required. Dietary exposure to PFCs among Canadians poses minimal health risks based on current toxicological information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".