Proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT): molecular cloning, tissue expression patterns and the effects of dietary folate supplementation on mRNA expression in laying hens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. The aim was to investigate the molecular characterisation and effects of dietary folate supplementation on mRNA concentrations of the proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT) in chicken. 2. Twenty-four (n = 8/treatment) laying hens were allocated at random to one of three dietary treatments: a basal diet without supplemental folate, or the same diet with either 10·00 mg/kg folic acid or 11·30 (equimolar) mg/kg 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) for 21 d. The PCFT cDNA was cloned using the TA cloning system, and mRNA concentrations were determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). 3. The PCFT cDNA (1643 bp) was cloned from the duodenum and its transcripts were widely distributed in chicken tissues. Duodenal and caecal PCFT mRNA was not affected by dietary treatments; however, jejunal PCFT mRNA was significantly reduced in hens fed the 5-MTHF diet versus the basal diet. 4. A broad tissue distribution of PCFT transcripts is indicative of a vital role of PCFT in the folate transport in chicken. The expression of jejunal PCFT mRNA was down-regulated by dietary 5-MTHF supplementation. These findings contribute to an understanding of the development of folate transport and the PCFT system in avian systems involving laying hens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".