MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013302093 · doi:10.1144/0262-821x09-005

The Dawangou auxiliary GSSP (Xinjiang autonomous region, China) of the base of the Upper Ordovician Series: putting global chitinozoan biostratigraphy to the test

2010· article· en· W2013302093 on OpenAlexaff
Jan A.I. Hennissen, Thijs R.A. Vandenbroucke, Xu Chen, Peng Tang, Jacques Verniers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micropalaeontology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersVlaamse regeringUniversiteit GentFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsBiozoneGlobal Boundary Stratotype Section and PointSensuPaleontologyBiostratigraphyOrdovicianGeologyGenusBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Dawangou section, an auxiliary Global Stratoype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Upper Ordovician Series, was sampled for chitinozoans. The 32 samples taken from the black shales of the Saergan Formation, spanning the Pterograptus elegans, Didymograptus murchisoni and Nemagraptus gracilis graptolite biozones, yielded 6536 chitinozoan vesicles. In addition to a diverse endemic assemblage, species important for international correlation were recovered, which enables the subdivision of the Saergan Formation into two chitinozoan biozones, one subzone and one provisionally recognized biozone: the Baltoscandian Laufeldochitina striata Biozone and the Laurentian Lagenochitina sp. A (sensu Achab, 1984) (/Belonechitina hirsuta) Biozone, and the Belonechitina tuberculata Subzone are recognized based on the presence of the index species, while the Baltoscandian Laufeldochitina stentor Biozone is provisionally recognized on the presence of Laufeldochitina sp. A aff. striata sensu Grahn et al., 1996 which has a range confined to the latter biozone. One new chitinozoan species is described: Cyathochitina giraffa sp. nov. and two species were assigned to a different genus: Belonechitina tuberculata comb. nov. and Hercochitina seriespinosa comb. nov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MicropalaeontologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207