MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CALCIUM BIOAVAILABILITY of QUARG WITH INCREASED CALCIUM CONTENT PRODUCED BY ADDITION of RHUBARB

2000· article· en· W2013325235 on OpenAlex
Jiapeng Cai, B. Ooraikul, P. Jelen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Processing and Preservation · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPolysaccharides Composition and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryBioavailabilityFood scienceCalciumOxalic acidLactic acidStalkOxalateBiochemistryHorticultureOrganic chemistryBacteriaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The possibility of increasing the Ca content of quarg product by using rhubarb stalk puree or juice in the manufacturing process was investigated. the studies included (1) production of quarg using rhubarb stalk puree or juice as coagulant; (2) determination of Ca absorption from the quarg products made with rhubarb; and (3) modifying the oxalate content of the rhubarb coagulants. The Ca contents of the quarg products made with either rhubarb stalk puree or juice were significantly higher than the control products made with direct addition of lactic acid (p<0.05), but the Ca absorption ascertained in rat feeding studies was significantly lower from the rhubarb containing products than from the controls (p<0.05). the low Ca bioavailability was attributed to the presence of calcium oxalate from the rhubarb. Rhubarb fiber did not affect the Ca absorption. After removing the oxalic acid from the rhubarb coagulants by treatment with CaCl2 and HCl, the Ca content of the resulting quarg decreased but was still higher than in the lactic acid quarg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it