CALCIUM BIOAVAILABILITY of QUARG WITH INCREASED CALCIUM CONTENT PRODUCED BY ADDITION of RHUBARB
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The possibility of increasing the Ca content of quarg product by using rhubarb stalk puree or juice in the manufacturing process was investigated. the studies included (1) production of quarg using rhubarb stalk puree or juice as coagulant; (2) determination of Ca absorption from the quarg products made with rhubarb; and (3) modifying the oxalate content of the rhubarb coagulants. The Ca contents of the quarg products made with either rhubarb stalk puree or juice were significantly higher than the control products made with direct addition of lactic acid (p<0.05), but the Ca absorption ascertained in rat feeding studies was significantly lower from the rhubarb containing products than from the controls (p<0.05). the low Ca bioavailability was attributed to the presence of calcium oxalate from the rhubarb. Rhubarb fiber did not affect the Ca absorption. After removing the oxalic acid from the rhubarb coagulants by treatment with CaCl2 and HCl, the Ca content of the resulting quarg decreased but was still higher than in the lactic acid quarg.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".