MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W201334339

A comparison of lower extremity muscle strength, obesity, and depression scores in elderly subjects with knee pain with and without radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis.

2000· article· en· W201334339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K D Brandt, Douglas K. Heilman, Charles W. Slemenda, Barry P. Katz, Steven A. Mazzuca, Ethan M. Braunstein, Donna Byrd

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKnee painOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyHamstringCohortDepression (economics)Muscle weaknessWOMACPhysical examinationRadiographyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine, in subjects with knee pain but no radiographic changes of tibiofemoral or patellofemoral compartment osteoarthritis (OA), whether mean body weight, quadriceps and hamstring strength, lower extremity muscle mass, depression scores, and perceptions of their general health status differed from those of subjects with symptomatic knee OA. METHODS: Subjects were 25 women and 10 men with knee pain and radiographic evidence of OA at the baseline examination, and 21 women and 16 men who had knee pain at the baseline examination but no radiographic evidence of knee OA at either baseline examination or followup evaluation performed, on average, 31 months later. These individuals were a subset of a cohort of 462 independently living elderly individuals recruited by telephone interview after random selection through random digit dialing of households in central Indiana. Data from an additional 134 subjects who had neither knee pain nor radiographic changes of OA at either the baseline or followup examination were analyzed for comparison. Lower extremity muscle strength was measured by isokinetic dynamometry, lean tissue (i.e., muscle) mass in the lower extremities by dual x-ray absorptiometry, depression by Center for Epidemiology Depression (CES-D) scale. knee pain by Western Ontario McMaster University OA instrument, and perceived general health status by the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form-36. RESULTS: In contrast to those with symptomatic knee OA, those who had knee pain but no radiographic evidence of OA were less obese, had hamstring as well as quadriceps weakness, and had CES-D scores high enough to qualify for a diagnosis of clinical depression. CONCLUSION: Among subjects with knee pain but no OA--and among women in this subset, in particular--knee pain may be a manifestation of depression. rather than of joint disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207