No effect of the prothrombin G20210A mutation on protein C activation in a large kindred with type I protein C deficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously, we observed a positive association of prothrombin concentrations with thrombin generation (fragment 1 + 2) and thrombin activity (fibrinopeptide A), but no association with protein C activation peptide levels. We further evaluated a potential beneficial effect of increased prothrombin concentrations on activated protein C generation by assessing the plasma concentration of activated protein C in complex with protein C inhibitor (APC-PCI). Blood samples were used from 195 family members of a large French-Canadian kindred with type I protein C deficiency due to a 3363C insertion in the protein C gene. We utilized a new and highly sensitive assay for measuring the concentration of APC-PCI complex as a measure of the level of activation of protein C. Means of the plasma concentrations of the APC-PCI complex were compared among carriers and non-carriers of the prothrombin G20210A mutation. Protein C activity levels were positively associated with APC-PCI complex plasma concentrations; however, APC-PCI complex levels were not different for carriers of the prothrombin G20210A mutation than for non-carriers. Thus, carriers of the prothrombin G20210A mutation do not have increased protein C activation despite the increased thrombin generation resulting from the higher prothrombin concentrations associated with the G20210A mutation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".