MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013399030 · doi:10.1300/j301v03n01_17

Row Covers to Delay or Advance Maturity in Highbush Blueberry

2004· article· en· W2013399030 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall Fruits Review · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarVacciniumHorticultureShadingGrowing seasonCropYield (engineering)Nova scotiaMaturity (psychological)BiologyAgronomyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY A wide variety of hardy highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) cultivars are suitable for cultivation in parts of North-Eastern Canada, and especially Nova Scotia's Annapolis Valley (latitude 45 EN). The object of this research was to investigate the potential to expand late market opportunities for exported fruit from northern areas by using a combination of controlled atmosphere (CA) storage and in-field row covers to delay fruit maturity in two cultivars (‘Bluegold’ and ‘Brigitta’), and to advance maturity in the cultivar ‘Elliott’, that normally matures too late for full harvest at this latitude. Covering ‘Blue-gold’ and ‘Brigitta’ with 50% shading from time of fruit set to harvest delayed full harvest by about 2.5 weeks in the first year. Yield decreases were recorded in the 2nd year of covering suggesting that covering with this density may diminish long-term yield potential. Fruit quality following after 6 weeks of CA storage (10% CO2, 16% O2, 0°C) was not affected by shading and after 42 days of storage fruit showed very little decay. Decay increased substantially after 63 days of storage. A removable row cover (6 mil polyethylene) advanced maturity in ‘Elliott’ in the first year by between 10 and 14 days, but this advancement was not repeated in the second season. In the first year, covering the crop only until petal drop was nearly as effective as covering throughout the season. Yield from covered plants was increased about 25% in the first year as compared with the controls, but this increase was not realized in the second year. ‘Elliott’ fruit from all treatments stored successfully for up to 42 days, and up to 63 days in control plants; fruit from covered plants showed a 30% decline in marketability when subjected to an additional 7 days in air at 7°C following 63 days in CA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it