Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxidation of [CpFe(eta(5)-C(5)H(4)PtBu(2))] with Me(3)SiN(3) gave the phosphinimine [CpFe(eta(5)-C(5)H(4)PtBu(2)NSiMe(3))] (1) which was used to prepare [Cp'TiCl(2)(NPtBu(2)C(5)H(4))FeCp] (Cp' = Cp , Cp* 4) and subsequently [Cp'TiMe(2)(NPtBu(2)C(5)H(4))FeCp] (Cp' = Cp 3, Cp* 5). Similarly, [(eta(5)-C(5)Ph(5))Fe(eta(5)-C(5)H(4)PtBu(2)NSiMe(3))] 6 was converted to [CpTiX(2)(NPtBu(2)C(5)H(4))Fe(eta(5)-C(5)Ph(5))] (X = Cl 7, Me 8). The bis-phosphinimine [Fe{eta(5)-C(5)H(4)PtBu(2)(NSiMe(3))}(2)] (9) was prepared and used to obtain [{Fe(eta(5)-C(5)H(4)PtBu(2)N)(2)}TiCl(2)] (10) and [{Fe(eta(5)-C(5)H(4)PtBu(2)N)(2)}TiMe(2)] (11). These species exhibited a temperature dependent conformational change in the chelate geometry on the NMR time scale. Cyclic voltammetry studies showed pseudo reversible redox waves assigned to the Fe(2+)/Fe(3+) couple for 2 and 4, while 10 exhibited only irreversible oxidations. Compound was also used to prepare [Fe(eta(5)-C(5)H(4)PtBu(2)NTiXCl(2))(2)] (X = Cl 12, Cp 13, Cp* 15). Compounds 3 and 5 react with B(C(6)F(5))(3) or [CPh(3)][B(C(6)F(5))(3)] to generate salts of the formula [Cp'TiMe{(NPtBu(2)C(5)H(4))FeCp}]X (Cp' = Cp, X = [MeB(C(6)F(5))(3)] 17a, [B(C(6)F(5))(4)] 17b; Cp' = Cp*, X = [MeB(C(6)F(5))(3)] 18a, [B(C(6)F(5))(4)] 18b). Compounds 18 further generated [Cp*TiMe{HNPtBu(2)(C(5)H(4))Fe(eta(5),eta(1)-C(5)H(4))}]X (X = [MeB(C(6)F(5))(3)] 19a, [B(C(6)F(5))(4)] 19b), respectively. The cationic species 17a and 18a are very active polymerization catalysts, giving polyethylene with activities of 2400 and 5000 g mmol(-1) h(-1) atm(-1), respectively at 25 degrees C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".