Differential regulation and localization of carboxypeptidase D and carboxypeptidase E in human and mouse β-cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperglycemia can result from a relative or absolute lack of functional insulin secreted by the pancreatic β-cells. Prohormone processing enzymes play an essential role in the secretion of mature and fully functional insulin. Defects in insulin processing enzymes including prohormone convertases 1/3 and 2, and carboxypeptidase E (CPE) can lead to β-cell stress and hyperproinsulinemia, both of which are features of type 2 diabetes. Despite their importance, the regulation and role of this family of enzymes remain to be fully elucidated. Previously, we demonstrated that lipotoxicity led to the degradation of CPE, but did not affect its related enzyme, carboxypeptidase D (CPD). In this study, we found that CPD was significantly up-regulated by elevated glucose, while CPE was not. Low doses of insulin also increased CPD protein levels, consistent with a role for autocrine signaling. Glucose and insulin did not affect CPD or CPE expression in an α-cell line. Furthermore, insulin treatment altered the CPD sub-cellular localization, which was distinct from CPE. Somewhat surprisingly, the loss of CPE did not affect the levels of CPD. Knockdown of CPD exerted no effect on CPE protein levels. In addition, while our previous study demonstrated that even modest reduction of CPE was sufficient to induce β-cell apoptosis, CPD knockdown did not affect cell viability. Taken together, our data demonstrate that CPE and CPD are differentially localized, differentially regulated and unlikely to have compensatory functions in pancreatic β-cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".