MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013525502 · doi:10.1080/10402000701739230

A New Model for Transition Flow of Thin Films in Long Journal Bearings

2007· article· en· W2013525502 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTribology Transactions · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Lubrication Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsLaminar flowTurbulenceTaylor–Couette flowInertiaReynolds numberVortexEccentricity (behavior)ViscosityRotational symmetryPhysicsReynolds equationMaterials scienceClassical mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper investigates the flow of a viscous fluid in the narrow gap (C/R = 0.002 to 0.01) between two cylinders with low eccentricity ratios (ϵ ≤ 0.2), where the shaft radius is 25.4 mm (1.0 in.). The computational engine is provided by CFD-ACE+, a commercial multi-task software. Calculations show that during the Taylor vortex regime velocity profiles in the radial direction are sinusoidal, and that pressure does vary in the axial direction even for the case of the “long journal bearing” (L/D > 2). Both velocity and pressure profiles are axisymmetric and time-independent during the Taylor vortex regime for the concentric case (ϵ = 0). During the wavy vortex regime the velocities maintain their sinusoidal profiles, while pressure varies in both axial and circumferential directions. Both velocity and pressure profiles are non-axisymmetric and time-dependent. An order of magnitude analysis for the Navier-Stokes equation shows that the inertia, viscous terms, pressure, and the Reynolds stress terms are equally significant. Based on these findings, a new model for predicting the flow behavior in long journal bearing films in the transition regime (Taylor and wavy vortex regimes) is proposed and justified. The new model indicates that the velocity profiles are sinusoidal and depend on the local Reynolds number and the position in the axial direction. Unlike the modified turbulent viscosity of the most accepted models (Constantinescu, Ng-Pan, Hirs, and Gross et al.), the value of the dynamic viscosity used in the new model is kept at its laminar original value. Finally, a modified form for the Reynolds equation is proposed for the transition regime; a comparison is made between the results of this model and the four most accepted turbulence models mentioned above. KEY WORDS: New ModelTransition FlowNarrow GapsLong Journal BearingsVelocity ProfilesTransition Reynolds EquationTurbulence Models Acknowledgments Presented at the STLE Annual Meeting in Calgary, Alberta, Canada May 7-11, 2006 Review led by Gordon Kirk

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it