Association of comorbidities with increasing severity of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To analyze a large population of patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy (PN) to determine other meaningful comorbid etiologies for PN. METHODS: Peripheral Neuropathy is a common complication of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus; however, other potential causes for PN may be co-existing in patients with diabetes. A prospective cohort study was performed to assess patients with diabetes and PN. We compared patients having PN due solely to diabetes with patients possessing co-existing comorbidities, performing clinical (Toronto Clinical Scoring System and the Utah Early Neuropathy Scale), laboratory and electrophysiological assessments in all patients. RESULTS: Patients with either type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and co-existing comorbidities did not have more severe clinical or electrophysiological PN phenotypes overall. However, in patients with type 1 diabetes, presence of a lipid disorder was associated with greater PN severity. In type 2 diabetes patients, both a lipid disorder and cobalamin deficiency were associated with greater PN severity. There was no additive effect upon PN severity with presence of three or more comorbid etiologies. CONCLUSION: The presence of specific, and not general, comorbidities in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes corresponds with greater PN severity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".