Normal left-atrial structure and function despite concentric left-ventricular remodelling in a cohort of patients with Anderson–Fabry disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Anderson-Fabry Disease (AFD) is an important cause of cardiomyopathy characterized by concentric left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). We evaluated the extent of left-atrial (LA) structural and functional remodelling in this group of patients given that LA remodelling is a marker of adverse outcomes in the presence of LVH. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical profiles were obtained and cardiac MRI was performed in cohorts of patients with AFD (n = 31), healthy controls (n = 23), and a positive control cohort with known concentric remodelling and LVH (CR/H, n = 21). Of patients with AFD, 58% were on enzyme-replacement therapy (ERT), 84% were on renin-angiotensin system antagonism, and 65% were on statins. Despite a similar increase in LV mass index in the AFD when compared with the CR/H cohort, mean LA volumes for the AFD group were similar to those seen in the healthy control group. Following from this, we observed that the percentage contribution to LV stroke volume due to elastic/passive and active LA emptying was similar in the AFD and healthy control groups, while passive emptying was significantly lower in the CR/H group. The consequences of LVH in the AFD cohort were manifested in atrioventricular uncoupling, whereby the extent of elastic/passive and active LA emptying was not a function of the extent of longitudinal movement of the mitral annular plane, as it was in healthy control subjects. CONCLUSION: Left-atrial structure and function were relatively normal in our cohort of patients with AFD, who were also judiciously treated with a contemporary strategy that includes renin-angiotensin system antagonism, statins, and ERT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".