MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013630184 · doi:10.1021/ja513263j

Electrochemical Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Correlating Structural Information and Adsorption Processes of Pyridine at the Au(hkl) Single Crystal/Solution Interface

2015· article· en· W2013630184 on OpenAlexaff
Jian‐Feng Li, Yue‐Jiao Zhang, Alexander V. Rudnev, Jason R. Anema, Songbo Li, Wenjing Hong, Jacek Lipkowski, Thomas Wandlowski, Zhong‐Qun Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsChemistryPyridineRaman spectroscopyElectrochemistrySingle crystalAdsorptionNanoparticleElectrodeCrystallographyCrystal structureCrystal (programming language)NanotechnologyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrochemical methods are combined with shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (EC-SHINERS) for a comprehensive study of pyridine adsorption on Au(111), Au(100) and Au(110) single crystal electrode surfaces. The effects of crystallographic orientation, pyridine concentration, and applied potential are elucidated, and the formation of a second pyridine adlayer on Au(111) is observed spectroscopically for the first time. Electrochemical and SHINERS results correlate extremely well throughout this study, and we demonstrate the potential of EC-SHINERS for thorough characterization of processes occurring on single crystal surfaces. Our method is expected to open up many new possibilities in surface science, electrochemistry and catalysis. Analytical figures of merit are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207