Bibliographic record
Abstract
LH-RH in rat hypothalamic extract (HE) emerges in 2 peaks after gel filtration on Sephadex G-25 with pyridine acetate buffer (PAB), pH 5.8, 1 peak in the unretarded protein fraction and the other near the salt region. A synthetic LH-RH marker was found only in the peak near the salt region by elution with acid. Using a dialysis technique, a protein fraction, from which LH-RH and other small molecular weight material were dissociated by gel filtration on Sephadex G-25 with acid, showed affinity for synthetic LH-RH. Synthetic LH-RH in the hypothalamic protein solution was retained in the dialysis bags more effectively than other types of protein solutions. This binding protein is of relatively small molecular size according to gel filtration behavior on Sephadex G-75. Since the dialysis experiment showed extremely poor recovery of total LH-RH, we determined the rate of loss of LH-RH under several conditions. The rate of disappearance was significantly less in solutions containing protein derived from cerebellum and hypothalamus, compared to bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution or salt solution. The ability of the hypothalamic protein to retard the rate of disappearance of LH-RH is further evidence for a special affinity between LH-RH and the protein factor. It is concluded that the protein LH-RH complex is dissociated by lowering the pH and that the dissociated protein and synthetic LH-RH can be re-associated to form a protein-hormone (PrH) complex at neutral pH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".