The emerging importance of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in the regulation of the plant cell cycle and related processesThis review is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue on Plant Cell Biology.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cell division cycle in plants as in other eukaryotes is controlled by the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK). This CDK paradigm determines that developmental cues and environmental signals need to impinge on the CDK complex to affect the cell cycle. An important part of understanding cell cycle regulation is to understand how CDK is regulated by various factors. In addition, there are features that set the cell cycle regulation in plants apart from that in other eukaryotes such as animals. Our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms that underlie the differences is poor. A family of plant CDK inhibitor proteins has been identified. The plant CDK inhibitors share similarity with a family of animal CDK inhibitors in a small region, while most of the sequence and the structural layout of the plant CDK inhibitors are different from the animal counterparts. Studies of plant CDK inhibitors have been performed mostly with the CDK inhibitors from Arabidopsis called ICKs (also referred to as KRPs). ICKs interact with D-type cyclins and A-type CDK. Overexpression of ICKs has been shown to affect cell division, plant growth, and morphogenesis. Studies of ICKs have also provided insightful information on the control of endoreduplication in plants. These aspects as well as cellular localization and protein regulation of ICKs are reviewed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".