MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2013693023 · doi:10.1029/2006gl026090

Timescale dependency of spatial patterns in the variability of the Northern Hemisphere winter SLP field

2006· article· en· W2013693023 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongxu Zhao, G. W. K. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of East AngliaCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsNorthern HemisphereNorth Atlantic oscillationArctic oscillationClimatologyArcticSpatial variabilityCommon spatial patternPacific decadal oscillationSpatial ecologyGeologySouthern HemisphereOceanographySea surface temperature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic Oscillation (AO), the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and the Cold Ocean‐Warm Land Pattern (COWL) have been identified as important modes of variability in the Northern Hemisphere winter sea‐level pressure field. However, which one is most fundamental in describing this variability and the relationship between them are still important open questions. A key uncertainty is our lack of knowledge of the linkages between the Arctic, North Atlantic and North Pacific Oceans that are manifest in these modes. In this study, the authors investigate these linkages through a frequency dependent decomposition of the variability in the Northern Hemisphere sea‐level pressure field. In particular, the authors show that the spatial expression of the variability in this field has a frequency dependence that results in a NAO‐like pattern on inter‐annual timescales, an AO‐like pattern on inter‐decadal timescales and a COWL‐like pattern on multi‐decadal timescales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→