MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013737680 · doi:10.1029/2005gl025065

Satellite observation of chlorophyll and nutrients increase induced by Typhoon Megi in the Japan/East Sea

2006· article· en· W2013737680 on OpenAlexafffund
SeungHyun Son, Trevor Platt, Heather A. Bouman, Dong‐Kyu Lee, Shubha Sathyendranath

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersCanadian Space AgencyGoddard Space Flight CenterNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsTyphoonEnvironmental scienceUpwellingChlorophyll aNutrientSea surface temperaturePhytoplanktonOceanographySatelliteClimatologyGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Remotely‐sensed sea surface temperature (SST) and chlorophyll data were used to assess the biological response to the Typhoon Megi in the Japan/East Sea (JES). Mean SST from in situ measurements and satellite data decreased by about 2–4°C in the JES after Typhoon Megi. Mean concentration of MODIS chlorophyll in the post–typhoon period increased by about 70% along the typhoon passage. The cold, nutrient‐rich waters entrained into the surface layer lead to an enhancement of phytoplankton growth. Typhoon‐induced variability of nitrate, phosphate, and silicate at the sea surface of the JES were derived from the MODIS SST using a nutrient‐temperature relationship based on in situ measurements. After the passage of the typhoon, there were increases in NO3, PO4, and SiO2 by about 90%, 40%, and 35%, respectively. The nutrient flux brought into the surface water by the storm‐induced mixing has the potential to support new production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchFrench-language works237,207