MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013745363 · doi:10.1061/40866(198)3

Seasonal and Temperature Adjustment Models of Pavement Properties from Seismic Nondestructive Evaluation

2006· article· en· W2013745363 on OpenAlexaff
Nenad Gucunski, Rambod Hadidi, S Zaghloul, Ali Maher, Parisa Shokouhi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNondestructive testingFalling weight deflectometerEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringPavement engineeringEngineeringSubgradeMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) initiated a study with an objective to calibrate the AASHTO seasonal and temperature adjustment models, or to develop new ones that will take into consideration New Jersey specific environmental conditions. To achieve the objective, twenty-four pavement sections were instrumented to monitor pavement temperature and moisture, frost/heave penetration depth, rainfall and air temperature. A nondestructive testing (NDT) program was conducted on these sections for a period of two years. Seismic Pavement Analyzer (SPA) and Falling Weigh Deflectometer (FWD) were used to evaluate the pavement structural response and pavement properties (elastic moduli) on a monthly basis. From the collected environmental and NDT data, temperature and seasonal models were developed through statistical analyses, such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression analysis. The scope of the project is presented and pavement evaluations using SPA are discussed. Correlation of pavement layer moduli to environmental variables from three seismic tests: Ultrasonic Surface Wave (USW), Impulse Response (IR), and Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) are presented and observed trends are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207