MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013749834 · doi:10.1021/np900843b

Coumabiocins A−F, Aminocoumarins from an Organic Extract of <i>Streptomyces</i> sp. L-4-4

2010· article· en· W2013749834 on OpenAlexaff
Sarot Cheenpracha, Nicholas B. Vidor, Wesley Y. Yoshida, Julian Davies, Leng Chee Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Products · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreptomycesMoietyStereochemistryChemistryActinomycetalesStreptomycetaceaeFractionationBiochemistryBiologyChromatographyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bioassay-directed fractionation of the butanol extract of Streptomyces sp. L-4-4, using the hyphae formation inhibition assay of a prokaryotic whole cell, led to the isolation of six new aminocoumarins, coumabiocins A-F (1-6), along with two known compounds, novobiocin (7) and isonovobiocin (8). Coumabiocins A-E (1-5) contain three structural elements, a central 3-amino-7-hydroxycoumarin that is linked at the 3-amino group to a prenylated 4-hydroxybenzoic acid moiety and at the 7-position to an l-noviosyl sugar, while coumabiocin F (6) lacks the sugar moiety. Their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic methods including 1D- and 2D-NMR techniques and mass spectrometric analyses. Coumabiocins A-E (1-5) exhibited significant inhibitory activity against Streptomyces 85E and gave a 10-15 mm clear zone of inhibition at 20 microg/disk and a 10 mm bald and a 10 mm clear zone of inhibition at 5 and 10 microg/disk, respectively, whereas coumabiocin F (6) was inactive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural ProductsSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207