Short‐term Effects of Kainic Acid on CA1 Hippocampal Interneurons Differentially Vulnerable to Excitotoxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to identify the inhibitory interneurons of the rat hippocampal CA1 region selectively vulnerable in the kainic acid (KA) model of temporal lobe epilepsy and to determine whether their selective vulnerability could be due to differential short-term KA effects. METHODS: We quantified vulnerable interneurons in stratum oriens-alveus (O/A) by using immunohistochemistry for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), parvalbumin (PV), and somatostatin (SS) after KA injections in rats, and then compared in normal slices the effects of KA on interneurons either in O/A (vulnerable to KA) or in strata radiatum and lacunosum-moleculare (R/LM) (resistant to KA) by using whole-cell recording and calcium imaging. RESULTS: GAD-, PV- and SS-positive cells in O/A were decreased after KA treatment in P20 and P30 rats. Both short (1-min) and long (10-min) applications of KA produced similar tetrodotoxin (TTX)-insensitive membrane depolarization and decrease in input resistance in O/A and R/LM interneurons. KA responses were antagonized by CNQX and GYKI52466, suggesting AMPA receptor activation. KA also generated a similar increase in intracellular Ca2+ in O/A and R/LM interneurons, which was antagonized by CNQX and GYKI52466. CONCLUSIONS: The selective vulnerability of GAD-, PV-, and SS-immunopositive O/A interneurons in the KA model may not arise from cell-specific short-term membrane effects or calcium responses induced by KA, but from other glutamate receptor-mediated excitotoxic processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".