MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013812747 · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2014)131

The windows for kinetically mixed Z′-mediated dark matter and the galactic center gamma ray excess

2014· article· en· W2013812747 on OpenAlexaff
James M. Cline, Grace Dupuis, Zuowei Liu, Wei Xue

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Energy Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDark matterParticle physicsElectroweak interactionHyperchargeMAJORANAHidden sectorSterile neutrinoGauge bosonLight dark matterPhysics beyond the Standard ModelStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Galactic CenterFermionScalar field dark matterParameter spaceAstrophysicsDark energyNeutrinoGauge (firearms)GalaxyGauge theoryCosmologyNeutrino oscillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the simplest hidden sectors with signatures in the visible sector is fermionic dark matter χ coupled to a Z′ gauge boson that has purely kinetic mixing with the standard model hypercharge. We consider the combined constraints from relic density, direct detection and collider experiments on such models in which the dark matter is either a Dirac or a Majorana fermion. We point out sensitivity to details of the UV completion for the Majorana model. For kinetic mixing parameter ϵ ≤ 0.01, only relic density and direct detection are relevant, while for larger ϵ, electroweak precision, LHC dilepton, and missing energy constraints become important. We identify regions of the parameter space of m χ , m Z ′ , dark gauge coupling and ϵ that are most promising for discovery through these experimental probes. We study the compatibility of the models with the galactic center gamma ray excess, finding agreement at the 2-3σ level for the Dirac model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of High Energy PhysicsSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207