MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013853705 · doi:10.4161/isl.1.2.9263

The role of insulin signaling in the development of β-cell dysfunction and diabetes

2009· review· en· W2013853705 on OpenAlexafffund
Qinghua Wang, Tianru Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueIslets · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInsulinEndocrinologyInsulin resistanceInternal medicineHyperinsulinemiaBiologyInsulin oscillationIsletInsulin receptorDiabetes mellitusMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The peptide hormone insulin not only regulates metabolic pathways, but also proliferative signaling pathways. Insulin regulates cell proliferation, protein synthesis and gene expression in most, if not all, mammalian tissues. Extensive recent studies have shown that insulin also plays an important role in the regulation of pancreatic islet β-cell function. In the development of peripheral insulin resistance leading to an increased demand for insulin production, increase in β-cell mass by compensatory hyperplasia and hypertrophy of β-cells and insulin output is a crucial mechanism to maintain euglycemia. Indeed, impaired insulin signaling in the β-cells and increased β-cell apoptosis are associated with the onset of diabetes in obese insulin resistant type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Studies using gene knockout approaches in mice have further demonstrated that the insulin signaling in the β-cells is critical for mediating insulin action on them to maintain appropriate mass and insulin production. It is conceivable that insulin resistance, which is usually associated with the compensatory mechanism of hyperinsulinemia, occurring in the β-cells could be a major contributor leading to increased rate of β-cell death and declined β-cell mass. It is hypothesized that a strategy to improve intra-islet insulin action via enhancing β-cell responsiveness could be a considerable benefit in the prevention and treatment of T2DM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsletsSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207