MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013860712 · doi:10.1002/jnm.604

Composite right/left‐handed extended equivalent circuit (CRLH‐EEC) FDTD: stability and dispersion analysis with examples

2006· article· en· W2013860712 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and Fields · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamaterialFinite-difference time-domain methodEquivalent circuitCapacitanceTransmission lineInductancePhysicsOpticsMathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A composite right/left‐handed (CRLH) extended equivalent circuit (EEC) FDTD method with a stability criterion based on a Liapunov discrete energy function is presented and applied to investigate several transient and refractive phenomena occurring at the interface between a CRLH metamaterial (MTM) and a purely right‐handed (PRH) structure. This formulation consists in an extension of the equivalent circuit (EC) Yee scheme including a left‐handed (LH) series capacitance and shunt inductance in addition to the canonical right‐handed (RH) series inductance and shunt capacitance, so as to model general CRLH transmission line (TL) MTMs. This CRLH‐EEC FDTD scheme is shown to represent a convenient numerical scheme, with remarkable formulation compactness and high computational efficiency, for the analysis of any type of MTM structure. Moreover, this scheme, coupled with a Y‐matrix representation of the EEC Yee cell, is shown to rigorously restore the dispersion/attenuation relation of CRLH MTMs. Transient solutions for the propagation of a modulated Gaussian pulse through a PRH–CRLH interface highlights interesting effects such as space‐domain compression, infinite phase velocity modulation and the well‐known backward wave effect. Frequency‐domain analysis of the fields radiated by dipoles through the Veselago–Pendry lens shows how focusing is affected both qualitatively and quantitatively by the orientation of the dipoles. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it