A current controller for 1-phase pwm rectifiers using real-time internal feedback of the pwm controller signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A carrier-based unipolar PWM current controller for 1-phase PWM rectifiers is described that uses a PWM signal feedback loop with a low pass filter to force the current-error to be centred on zero. The proposed controller is intended for low cost discrete electronics and replaces the PI controller traditionally used to lower the current-error signal. A sawtooth carrier signal is used to synchronize the PWM waveforms and to obtain a constant switching frequency. A current-error signal and an amplitude modulation depth signal is obtained from the filtered PWM signal feedback and can be designed to take into account switch overlap and signal transmission delays. The filtered PWM signal more accurately represents the converter PWM output voltage waveform and, with an appropriately designed low pass filter, forces the current-error signal to be centred on zero over a PWM cycle. This signal feedback is internal to the controller and is illustrated using a second-order Butterworth filter. The maximum peak-peak ripple of the current-error signal is used as a design guideline for deciding the appropriate gain constant in the controller current feedback loop. The proposed controller has a performance comparable to PI and adaptive hysteresis current controllers that are more complex in structure to obtain the same performance. SPICE simulations and experimental results are used to demonstrate the controller operation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".