Characterization of an Endovascular Prosthesis Using the 3Bs Rule (Biocompatibility, Biofunctionality and Biodurability): A Recommended Protocol to Investigate a Device Harvested at Necropsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous endovascular stent grafts to treat intrarenal aortic aneurysms are now commercially available, and many new concepts are currently in development worldwide. In order to objectively quantify their outcomes, we propose a detailed protocol to examine a reference device that was harvested from a patient who died a few hours after endovascular stent-graft deployment for an abdominal aortic aneurysm according to the 3Bs rule (biocompatibility, biofunctionality, and biodurability). Relevant patient history of this 63-year-old man included radiotherapy treatment for lung cancer. Following the patient's death, the device was harvested en bloc together with the aneurysmal sac. The analysis of the device was conducted using nondestructive testing (X-rays, CT scan, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and endoscopy) and destructive testing (dissection, histology, and fabric and wire component analyses). Results from the gross examination demonstrated that the outer layer of the aneurysm sac was white, stiff, and continuous without any disruption. The Xray analysis, CT scan, and MRI confirmed that the device together with its modular segments was properly deployed at implantation. Endoscopy showed that the device was deployed securely immediately distal to the renal arteries. As anticipated, thin scattered mural thrombi at the blood/foreign material interface were observed on the blood tight flow surface. There were no tears in the fabric, and the dimensions and textile structure were well preserved. The metallic wires were intact. This fatality had no association with the stent graft as the patient's death was caused by the rupture of the pulmonary artery following intensive radiotherapy. In conclusion, autopsy, nondestructive testing, and destructive testing are therefore the necessary steps to validate any explanted endovascular stent graft in terms of biocompatibility, biofunctionality, and biodurability. In this specific case, the endovascular device fulfills the 3Bs rule. The authors recommend this protocol to investigate explanted endovascular devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".