Bibliographic record
Abstract
My title is a metaphor, for it is doubtful that Jefferson Davis actually spent time as far east in Canada as Quebec City. Neither his financial situation nor his state of mind would have had him venture too far from Lennoxville in the Eastern Townships of Quebec, where he had moved in October of 1867. Encouraged by James Mason to come to Niagara to join other high-ranking Confederate expatriates, Davis declined. While the unpleasant irony of Niagara as the site of freedom at the end of the Underground Railroad for escaping slaves might have weighed on his mind, Davis opted for the more familial choice of Montreal, where his older children had lived throughout the Civil War in the care of his wife's mother. 1 Yet it is also a metaphor for Jacques Parizeau in 1995, whose dramatically orchestrated "Preamble" to the Déclaration de souveraineté du Québec creates an uncanny feeling for students of American history. "We entered the federation on the faith of a promise of equality in a shared undertaking and out of respect for our authority in certain matters that to us are vital. But what was to follow did not live up to those early hopes. The Canadian State contravened the federative pact by [End Page 109] invading in a thousand ways areas in which we were autonomous, and by serving notice that our secular belief in the equality of the partners was an illusion." 2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".