MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013965924 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118566

Cluster-formation in the Rosette molecular cloud at the junctions of filaments

2012· article· en· W2013965924 on OpenAlexaff
N. Schneider, T. Csengeri, M. Hennemann, F. Motte, P. Didelon, Christoph Federrath, S. Bontemps, James Di Francesco, D. Arzoumanian, V. Minier, Ph. André, T. Hill, A. Zavagno, Q. Nguyễn Lương, Michael Attard, J.-P. Bernard, D. Elia, C. Fallscheer, M. J. Griffin, J. M. Kirk, Ralf S. Klessen, V. Könyves, P. G. Martin, A. Men’shchikov, P. Palmeirim, N. Peretto, M. Pestalozzi, D. Russeil, Sarah Sadavoy, T. Sousbie, L. Testi, Pascal Tremblin, D. Ward–Thompson, G. J. White

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesBundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und TechnologieCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueKU LeuvenBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationImperial College LondonCalifornia Institute of TechnologyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCardiff University
KeywordsMolecular cloudStar formationPhysicsAstrophysicsProtein filamentStarsStar clusterCluster (spacecraft)Rosette (schizont appearance)Mass segregationStellar evolutionRadiationChemistryBiologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims. For many years feedback processes generated by OB-stars in molecular clouds, including expanding ionization fronts, stellar winds, or UV-radiation, have been proposed to trigger subsequent star formation. However, hydrodynamic models including radiation and gravity show that UV-illumination has little or no impact on the global dynamical evolution of the cloud. Instead, gravitational collapse of filaments and/or merging of filamentary structures can lead to building up dense high-mass star-forming clumps. However, the overall density structure of the cloud has a large influence on this process, and requires a better understanding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations357
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207