Na<sub>6</sub>ZnSn<sub>2</sub>, Na<sub>4.24</sub>K<sub>1.76(1)</sub>ZnSn<sub>2</sub>, and Na<sub>20</sub>Zn<sub>8</sub>Sn<sub>11</sub>: Three Intermetallic Structures Containing the Linear {Sn−Zn−Sn}<sup>6−</sup> Unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The novel intermetallic compounds Na6ZnSn2 (1), Na4.24K1.76(1)ZnSn2 (2), and Na20Zn8Sn11 (3) were obtained from direct fusion of the pure elements, and their structures were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. All three compounds adopt new structure types and contain linear anionic {Sn-Zn-Sn}6- units with rather short Zn-Sn contacts (2.55-2.58 A), separated by alkali metal counterions. Compound 3 comprises layers of interconnected heteroatomic {Zn7Sn5} icosahedra as an additional unique structural motif. The bonding situation in this 16 valence-electron anion is analyzed by quantum chemical methods. The results of NBO, AIM, and ELF calculations (Gaussian03 on HF/3-21G level) reveal covalent bonding between Sn and Zn. The relationship to isovalent CO2 is discussed. Band structure calculations on the density functional theory level (LMTO) show that 1 can be understood as a Zintl phase containing a {Sn-Zn-Sn}6- anion; however, Na-Sn contacts must also be considered. Magnetic susceptibility measurements show a temperature-independent, weak diamagnetism for Na6ZnSn2 (1).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".