MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013977945 · doi:10.1002/2014jc010135

Similarity scaling of turbulence in a temperate lake during fall cooling

2014· article· en· W2013977945 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTurbulenceBuoyancyTurbulence kinetic energyScalingThermoclineAdvectionAtmospheric sciencesDissipationMechanicsRichardson numberEddy covarianceFlux (metallurgy)Sensible heatMeteorologyPhysicsGeologyThermodynamicsMaterials scienceClimatologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Turbulence, quantified as the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy (ε), was measured with 1400 temperature‐gradient microstructure profiles obtained concurrently with time series measurements of temperature and current profiles, meteorology, and lake‐atmosphere fluxes using eddy covariance in a 4 km 2 temperate lake during fall cooling. Winds varied from near calm to 5 m s −1 but reached 10 m s −1 during three storm events. Near‐surface values of ε were typically on the order of 10 −8 to 10 −7 m 2 s −3 and reached 10 −5 m 2 s −3 during windy periods. Above a depth equal to |L MO |, the Monin‐Obukhov length scale, turbulence was dominated by wind shear and dissipation followed neutral law of the wall scaling augmented by buoyancy flux during cooling. During cooling, ε z = 0.56 /kz + 0.77 J B0 and during heating ε z = 0.6 /kz, where is the water friction velocity computed from wind shear stress, k is von Karman's constant, z is depth, and J B0 is surface buoyancy flux. Below a depth equal to |L MO | during cooling, dissipation was uniform with depth and controlled by buoyancy flux. Departures from similarity scaling enabled identification of additional processes that moderate near‐surface turbulence including mixed layer deepening at the onset of cooling, high‐frequency internal waves when the diurnal thermocline was adjacent to the air‐water interface, and horizontal advection caused by differential cooling. The similarity scaling enables prediction of near‐surface ε as required for estimating the gas transfer coefficient using the surface renewal model and for understanding controls on scalar transport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it