MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design and Fracture of Layered Al <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> /TZ3Y Composites Produced by Electrophoretic Deposition

2001· article· en· W2014019818 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialDeflection (physics)Residual stressFracture mechanicsElectrophoretic depositionFracture toughnessCubic zirconiaVickers hardness testFlexural strengthCeramicMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alumina/yttria‐stablized tetragonal zirconia (Al 2 O 3 /TZ3Y) multilayer composites with strong interfaces and containing residual stresses were produced by electrophoretic deposition. As‐synthesized and Vickers‐indented samples with different layering designs have been tested in bending (up to 1300°C) to experimentally define conditions for crack deflection and flaw tolerance. The compressive residual stress in the Al 2 O 3 layers (ς r ) is a function of layer thickness ( t ). It was found that the parameter ς r 2 t is an effective indicator of the fracture behavior, as predicted by strain energy release calculations. With decreasing ς r 2 t , the fracture followed a sequence from spontaneous delamination, multistage fracture with extensive crack deflection, to catastrophic failure with, and finally without, deflection steps. Decrease of ς r with increasing test temperature causes changes in fracture behavior which correspond to the room‐temperature transitions of ς r 2 t .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it