The Mediating role of Market Orientation on Entrepreneurial Orientation, Absorptive Capacity and Technological Innovation Capabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study purposes to examine the mediating role of Market Orientation in its nexus amongEntrepreneurial Orientation, Absorptive Capacity and Technological Innovation Capabilities among constructionSMEs in Kurdistan region of Iraq. Due to the critical role of SMEs in construction industry for the reconstructionof Iraq in general and Kurdistan region in particular, the purpose of present study is to determine whether theMarket Orientation has a mediating role in its relation with the examined variables, so as to examine that, themodel of present study was developed. To validate the proposed model, self-administered questionnaire wereconducted to gathering data from SMEs owners in Kurdistan region of Iraq, 249 questionnaires returned andused for statistical analysis Out of 278 distributed. The outcomes of present research reflect that both ofAbsorptive Capacity and Entrepreneurial Orientation have significant effect on Technological InnovationCapabilities. Furthermore, the outcomes of present study assert that the Market Orientation has a partialmediation mechanism in the nexus between Absorptive Capacity and Technological Innovation Capabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".