Basaloid Squamous Carcinoma of the Anal Canal With an Adenoid Cystic Pattern
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two cases of a distinctive variety of basaloid squamous carcinoma (BSC) of the anal canal are described. Both occurred in female patients who presented with bleeding per rectum. Histologic evaluation of the tumors showed lobules and aggregates of medium-sized basaloid cells with distinctive peripheral palisading and focal areas of central, comedo-necrosis. Accompanying dysplasia of the overlying squamous mucosa was absent. However, the microscopic pattern was dominated by the presence of eosinophilic, hyaline, paucicellular basement membrane-like material around and within tumor nests. This appearance together with microcystic spaces simulated that of an adenoid cystic carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry of the tumors revealed the following profile: CK7, CK5/CK6, 34betaE12 positive, CK14 focally positive but CK20 negative. The following were all negative: EMA, CEA, smooth muscle and muscle-specific actin, calponin, and S-100. The tumor cells exhibited diffuse nuclear positivity with p63. The eosinophilic basement membrane hyaline material was positive for collagen type IV and also for laminin. BSC of the anal canal with an adenoid cystic pattern is an infrequently encountered and reported variant, although it is seen more often in the aerodigestive tract. There may be an increased propensity for BSC with an adenoid cystic pattern to metastasize to the liver, but the number of cases encountered are too small to be definitive. The histologic differential diagnosis is true salivary gland-type adenoid cystic carcinoma and basal cell adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry and awareness of this unusual pattern of BSC will facilitate the correct diagnosis being reached.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".