MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014091794 · doi:10.1353/smr.2012.0029

Co-opting Classicism and Debating Cultural Identity on the German National Stage in Mannheim

2012· article· en· W2014091794 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanNational identityScholarshipEliteIdentity (music)HistoryEnlightenmentClassicismGerman studiesArt historyClassicsLiteratureArtPolitical scienceLawAestheticsPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The German stage was dominated by Italian operas and translations of French and Shakespearean dramas at the beginning of the eighteenth century, but numerous voices were also calling for significant reforms. Johann Christoph Gottsched was among the first critics to exhort Germans to produce their own plays. He was followed by Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, who urged German play- wrights to stage the issues confronting the emerging middle class, while Johann Gottfried was a passionate proponent of dramas based on German histori- cal figures, events, or myths. Scholarship on the relationship of German theatre to national identity has focused almost exclusively on playwrights' response to these repeated calls. In his introduction to National Theatres in a Changing Europe, S. E. Wilmer argues that national theatres and their audiences be regarded as a potential microcosm of the nation (or elite of that nation) in an active forum for national debate about cultural identity (2). Indeed, an examina- tion of the discussions and activities at these institutions can offer insights into the early formation of a nation's character - whether realized or only ima- gined, as Benedict Anderson has argued. In the case of the German-speaking world, scholars have concentrated their attention primarily on the repertories at the four major theatres - Hamburg (1767), Weimar (1775, with the arrival of Jo- hann Wolfgang von Goethe), Vienna (1776), and Mannheim (1779) - estab- lished during the age of Enlightenment when the discourse on German identity began in earnest. Recent studies on the extent to which these artistic centres aided and advanced the creation of a German nation or a sense of cultural nation- alism cover a broad spectrum - from little or no contribution (Echternkamp 132- 33; Krebs 586-88; Steinmetz 150) to significant or major milestones (Hoyng 217; Wilmer, Herder 64). Regardless of whether or not they see the theatre as central to the formation of national identity, scholars have reached their conclu- sions by analysing the same material - the authorship and subject matter of the plays performed. While an examination of German plays and playwrights in the eighteenth century is clearly essential, this study expands the scope of the inves- tigation to include what the actors themselves have to say on the matter of national identity. In contrast to the published dramas, the actual recorded minutes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic StudiesSame topicGerman Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207