MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014158951 · doi:10.1179/joc.2005.17.6.593

Antimicrobial Spectrum and Potency of Dalbavancin Tested Against Clinical Isolates from Europe and North America (2003): Initial Results from an International Surveillance Protocol

2005· article· en· W2014158951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ronald N. Jones, Thomas R. Fritsche, Hélio S. Sader, Beth P. Goldstein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemotherapy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDalbavancinTeicoplaninDalfopristinQuinupristinMicrobiologyEnterococcus faeciumLinezolidBroth microdilutionVancomycinEnterococcusGlycopeptideStaphylococcus aureusPenicillinStreptococcus pneumoniaeMedicineMinimum inhibitory concentrationAntimicrobialBiologyAntibioticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dalbavancin is a bactericidal dimethylaminopropyl amide glycopeptide derivative possessing an extended serum elimination half-life in humans that allows once-weekly dosing for the therapy of Gram-positive infections. Strains from this baseline surveillance protocol in North America (NA; USA and Canada) and Europe (EU, 14 countries) were sampled in 2003. A total of 7,765 Gram-positive isolates (3,695 from NA and 4,070 from EU) were tested by reference broth microdilution methods against dalbavancin and 10 comparator agents. Species were analyzed separately by resistance phenotypes such as methicillin- (oxacillin-) resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Dalbavancin and other glycopeptides were very active against staphylococci (n=4648) with dalbavancin being 16- to 32-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC90, 0.06 versus 2 mg/L). MRSA rates were greater (31.6%) in NA than in EU (26.1%). Quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance (MIC, > or = 2 mg/L; 0.1-0.5%) was documented more often in EU compared to NA. Dalbavancin (MIC50, 0.03-0.06 mg/L) was active against enterococci, except VanA resistance phenotypes. VRE rates were lower in EU (8.3%) then in NA (35.9%) from this resistance-enhanced enterococcal collection. Streptococci (dalbavancin MIC90, 0.016-0.03 mg/L) were generally most susceptible to glycopeptides (100.0%), quinupristin/dalfopristin (98.6-100.0%) and linezolid (100.0%); but dalbavancin was 16-fold more active than comparators. All vancomycin-susceptible enterococci and > 90% of vanB VRE had dalbavancin MIC values at < or = 1 mg/L,but vanA VRE strains had dalbavancin MIC results ranging from 0.06 to > 8 mg/L (median MIC, > or = 8 mg/L). Dalbavancin MIC values were not adversely influenced by geographic region or resistance phenotype (except vanA VRE). Infrequently isolated Gram-positive organisms such as Bacillus spp. (MIC90, 0.12 mg/L), Corynebacterium spp. (MIC90, 0.12 mg/L), Listeria monocytogenes (MIC90, 0.25 mg/L) and Micrococcus spp. (MIC90, 0.03 mg/L) were very susceptible to dalbavancin. In conclusion, these 2003 baseline resistance surveillance findings confirm the potent dalbavancin activity compared to several comparator agents against important Gram-positive pathogens. This high volume international survey indicates potential therapeutic roles for dalbavancin against many troublesome resistant Gram-positive phenotypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ChemotherapySame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207