MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014165425 · doi:10.1143/jjap.45.6253

Study of Interactions of Hf and SiO<sub>2</sub> Film for High-k Materials

2006· article· en· W2014165425 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Te‐Wei Chiu, Masaaki Tanabe, Akira Uedono, Ryu Hasunuma, Kikuo Yamabe

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdsorptionAuger electron spectroscopySubstrate (aquarium)Materials scienceLayer (electronics)Atomic force microscopyAugerElectron beam physical vapor depositionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Thin filmEvaporationDielectricChemistryOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyPhysical chemistryAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hf adsorption on thin SiO 2 films was carried out using an ultrahigh-vacuum system with e-beam evaporation. The interaction of adsorbed Hf and SiO 2 films was studied by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and current–voltage ( I – V ) measurements. The leakage current of the SiO 2 films increased with Hf adsorption temperature. The dielectric properties of the SiO 2 layer were markedly degraded by Hf adsorption even at 300 °C. Additionally, Hf adsorbed on a SiO 2 (6.3 nm)/Si substrate at 900 °C penetrated through the SiO 2 layer and reacted with the Si substrate forming large concavities. Otherwise, Si diffused from the SiO 2 /Si interface to the surface of adsorbed Hf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207