MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014207890 · doi:10.1002/qua.21643

Density functional theory calculation of 2p spectra of SiH<sub>4</sub>, PH<sub>3</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S, HCl, and Ar

2008· article· en· W2014207890 on OpenAlexaff
Delano P. Chong, Maximiliano Segala, Yuji Takahata, Evert Jan Baerends

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySpectral lineDensity functional theoryIonizationAtomic physicsElectronValence (chemistry)Absorption spectroscopyBasis setCore electronValence electronIonization energyComputational chemistryPhysicsQuantum mechanicsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The method developed recently for prediction of 1s electron spectra is now extended to the 2p spectra of SiH 4 , PH 3 , H 2 S, HCl, and Ar. The method for X‐ray absorption spectra involves the use of Δ E for the excitation and ionization energies, and application of time‐dependent density functional theory using the exchange‐correlation potential known as statistical average of orbital potentials for the intensities. Additional assumptions and approximations are also made. The best exchange‐correlation functional E xc for the earlier calculation of Δ E in 1s spectra of C to Ne (namely Perdew–Wang 1986 exchange, combined with Perdew–Wang 1991 correlation) is no longer used in this work on 2p spectra of Si to Ar. Instead, recently tested E xc good for 2p core‐electron binding energies (known as OPTX) for exchange and LYP for correlation, plus scalar zeroth‐order regular approximation is adopted here for the Δ E calculations. Our calculated X‐ray absorption spectra are generally in good agreement with experiment. Although the predictions for the higher excitations suffer from basis set difficulties, our procedure should be helpful in the interpretation of absorption spectra of 2p electrons of Si to Ar. In addition, we report calculated results for other kinds of electron spectra for SiH 4 , PH 3 , H 2 S, HCl, and Ar, including valence electron ionizations and excitations as well as X‐ray emission. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2008

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Quantum ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207