MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014208111 · doi:10.1089/109662003772519868

<i>In Vitro</i> Anti-Cancer Activities in Caco-2 and HCT-116 Cells of Recombinant Cystatin C Prepared by a <i>Pichia</i> Expression System

2003· article· en· W2014208111 on OpenAlexaff
Masahiro Ogawa, Hao Jing, David D. Kitts, Shuryo Nakai, Soichiro Nakamura

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Food · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPepstatinPichia pastorisCystatinProtease inhibitor (pharmacology)Cathepsin CCathepsin BMolecular biologyIn vitroRecombinant DNAChemistryProteaseMatrix metalloproteinaseCystatin CCell cultureBiologyBiochemistryEnzymeImmunologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Caco-2 and HCT-116 cells were used to access growth-inhibition and anti-invasion activity of recombinant cystatin C expressed in Pichia pastoris X33, G12W/H86V. The mutant G12W/H86V prepared by a pilot plant production system showed more than 10% growth inhibition of Caco-2 cells at 0.56-56 nM concentrations. Growth-inhibited cells had lower cathepsin L activity than the control cells that were not treated with the inhibitor. Conversely, the cathepsin B activity was not changed by treatment with G12W/H86V. The in vitro anti-invasion test using HCT-116 cells showed that G12W/H86V suppressed the cell invasion by 15%, while its wild-type cystatin, aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin A, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor MMP-2/MMP-9 inhibitor III did not suppress cell invasion. These results indicate that the recombinant cystatin C with higher protease inhibitory activity effectively retards the growth and invasiveness of human colon carcinoma cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medicinal FoodSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207