Empyema Management: Twelve Years' Experience Since the Introduction of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We reviewed empyema management at our center since video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was introduced. Between 1991 and 2003, 58 patients (34 male, 24 female) ages 1 day to 17 years (median, 6 years) were identified. The median interval from the onset of symptoms to presentation was 7 days; 31% of patients received inpatient care at another hospital, and 24% were from northern communities, including the Arctic. Symptoms included fever (100%), cough (66%), shortness of breath (46%), chest pain (38%), and abdominal pain (17%). Most patients (96%) had pneumonia. The most common organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae (22%), group A streptococcus (8%), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (3%). No organisms were identified in 31% of patients. One empyema was trauma-related and one was due to complications of esophageal stricturoplasty. All patients received intravenous antibiotics (median, 17 days). Three patients had thoracentesis, 17 had chest tubes, 3 had thoracentesis and chest tubes, 26 had VATS, 6 had thoracotomy, and 3 had minithoracotomy. Median operative times were 86 minutes for VATS, 90 minutes for thoracotomy, and 75 minutes for minithoracotomy. Median total length of stay (LOS) was 15 days for VATS, 20.5 days for thoracotomy, and 21 days for minithoracotomy. The median preoperative LOS was longer for thoracotomy (10 days) than for VATS (5 days) or minithoracotomy (1 day). The median postoperative LOS was 14 days for VATS, 9.5 days for thoracotomy, and 8 days for minithoracotomy. Our experience shows that VATS is a safe and effective approach to managing children with empyema. The shorter preoperative LOS for VATS is likely due to earlier surgical referral and intervention using less invasive surgical procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".