2-Pyrrolylthiones as Monoanionic Bidentate N,S-Chelators: Synthesis and Molecular Structure of 2-Pyrrolylthionato Complexes of Nickel(II), Cobalt(III), and Mercury(II)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The metal-chelating ability of 2-pyrrolylthiones is described. The readily available ligands di-2-pyrrolyl thione (6), 2-thioacetylpyrrole (10), and 2-thiobenzoylpyrrole (11) constitute examples of monoanionic ligands with N,S-donor atom sets, although di-2-pyrrolyl thione (6) could theoretically also achieve chelation through an N,N-donor set. A square planar Ni(II) complex, 14, an octahedral Co(III) complex, 18, and a tetrahedral Hg(II) complex, 17, with the di-2-pyrrolyl thionato chelate have been prepared, and their structures have been characterized by 1H NMR, UV-vis, MS, IR, elemental analysis, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Crystal data for 14: C18H14N4NiS2.0.28H2O, trigonal, R3, a = 18.467(1) A, b = 18.467(1) A, c = 26.404(2) A, V = 7797(1) A3; Z = 18, R = 3.2%. Crystal data for 18-mer: C27H21CoN6S3.C3H6O (acetone), monoclinic, P21/n, a = 9.569(1) A, b = 23.152(1) A, c = 13.659(1) A, beta = 100.882(8) degrees, V = 2971.6(5) A3, Z = 4, R = 4.3%. Crystal data for 17: C18H14HgN4S2, triclinic, P1, a = 8.443(2), b = 14.278(1) A, c = 7.445(1) A, alpha = 90.561(9) degrees, beta = 97.64(1) degrees, gamma = 104.250(9) degrees, V = 861.3(2) A3, Z = 2, R = 4.2%. The bond lengths and angles of these metal complexes are comparable to those of known N,S-chelates. A comparison of the structural parameters of the ligand in the metal complexes with those for the free ligand 6 demonstrates the preorganization of the free ligand for complexation and demonstrates the spectator role of the noncoordinating pyrrolic unit. Chelation of Ni(II) by 2-thioacetylpyrrole (10) and 2-thiobenzoylpyrrole (11) to provide complexes 12 and 13 with structures analogous to complex 14 is also described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it