Donor-Specific Antibodies, C4d and Their Relationship With the Prognosis of Transplant Glomerulopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is a diagnostic criterion for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAABMR), with C4d, donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and other lesions of chronic tissue injury. However, TG often presents without C4d or DSA. Until recently, such cases were termed suspicious for CAABMR, and their prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: To better understand the contribution of TG, C4d, and DSA on outcomes, we retrospectively studied 61 patients with late TG for the composite endpoint of death-censored graft failure or doubling of serum creatinine. Cases were matched to controls based on age, year and number of transplant, type of donor, and the availability of an indication biopsy during the same time after transplantation. Analyses were performed using proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Compared to matched controls, patients with TG had a more than fivefold increased risk of reaching the endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 5.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.5-18.4). The proportion of patients with isolated TG, TG suspicious for CAABMR (C4+/DSA- or C4d-/DSA+) and TG with definite CAABMR (C4d+/DSA+) were 63%, 20%, and 17%, respectively. Suspicious and definite CAABMR showed a similar prognosis, significantly worse than isolated TG (aHR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1-18.9 and aHR, 5.9, 95% CI, 1.1-31.3 respectively). CONCLUSION: Transplant glomerulopathy is associated with poor prognosis, independent of the level of graft dysfunction and other chronic histologic changes. This prognosis is similar whether there is evidence of tissue or peripheral alloantibody reactivity. These findings are relevant to the development of clinically meaningful criteria for CAABMR, for its clinical management, and in the future selection of population for clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".