Preparation and Post-Functionalization of Hyperbranched Polyurea Coatings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Postfunctionalizable hyperbranched polyurea coatings were prepared by the bulk polycondensation of AB2 monomers on preactivated silicon substrates. As previously shown, AB2 monomers were prepared, comprising a secondary amino group (A) and two blocked isocyanates (B) connected by hexyl spacers, in a single step and in quantitative yields. Covalent anchoring of the coatings on substrates was accomplished by reacting the secondary amino group in the focal point of the polymers with the blocked isocyanates (BIs) of the covalently attached coupling agent. The BIs in the top layer of the coatings were storage-stable under ambient conditions but well-modifiable with amino- or hydroxyl-functional compounds on heating. Attachment of polyethylene glycol or perfluoro-1-decanol afforded hydrophilic or hydrophobic surfaces. Immobilization and quaternization of polyethylenimines yielded highly charged surfaces. The coatings were extensively characterized by a number of techniques, such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, ellipsometry, and contact -angle measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".